Analysis W7: The Life of Olaudah Equiano
Simply Human
How could there be any
justification of the ownership of a human being? I never understood how anyone could
justify the inhumane treatment of another human being. Growing up I would hear and read about such
justification: It was God’s divine plan, Africans were naturally inferior to
whites because they did not, rather than could not, possess European
ingenuity. Somehow, a group of Europeans
had convinced themselves and their race that Africans were unhuman, perceived as poor benighted creatures in need of saving. Yet they were beaten, hung, raped, and enslaved. The autobiography of Olaudah Equiano demolishes,
as if it was ever fact, their erroneous claims in a brilliant fashion.
Africans were ignorant to
the European language, religion, manners, and customs but they were far from
being an uncivilized race of people. They were not educated in the western culture,
nor did they need to be for their way of life. In the same matter, Europeans
had forgotten that their ancestors were once, like the Africans, uncivilized,
and even barbarous, because their way of life differed from their children (86). Yet,
it did not make them inferior nor forced them to serve as slaves to their future
generations. The author further ridicules the notion that the lack of
understanding is confined to feature of color (86). Being untaught in a matter
does not make one stupid, barbaric, or inferior. As a matter of fact, the
author enlightens his readers of the culture, customs, and roles of his
country, which was opposite from the Europeans oblivious delineation. Equiano
informs his readers that the only distinctions between European and
African culture was luxury and wealth. “As our manners are simple, our luxuries
are few”, “in such a state is of little use; however, we have some small pieces
of coin, if I may call them such. They are made something like and anchor; but
I do not remember either their value or denomination” (79,80). Equiano connects
us with the humaneness of the people in Guinea pre-slave trade by describing their government,
wedding ceremonies, sufficiency in architectural designs, clothing, agricultural/domestic
employment, family traditions, armies, and African etiquette's. They were a community
of selfless people of high morals, “Agriculture is our chief employment’ and everyone,
even the children and women, are engaged in it. Thus, we are all habituated to labor
from our earliest years. Everyone contributes something to the common stock; and
as we are unacquainted with idleness, we have no beggars” (81). Equiano also introduces the notion of slavery
in his story, however interposes that slavery is a type of punishment for a crime
or being a prisoner of war. In doing so, he attacks the contention that Africans’
enslaved their own people to begin with, while emphasis the vast differences
between their treatment of slaves in comparison to the European slave trade. “with
us they do no more work than other members of the community, even their
masters; their food, clothing, and lodging were nearly the same as theirs,
(except that they were not permitted to eat with those who were free-born); and
there was scarce any other difference between them, than a superior degree of
importance which the head of a family possesses in our state, and that
authority which, as such, he exercises over every part of his household. Some of
these slaves even have slaves under them as their own property and for their
own use” (82). They treated their slaves with common decency, acknowledging that they were deserving of being treated as a human-being despite their crime or servanthood position.
In conclusion, the story
of Equiano is not just a slave narrative, but the author’s attempt to humanize Africans’
to an audience who might be ignorant and desensitized due to the suffering of Africans
due to them being depicted as less than human.
Equiano. Olaudah“The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa, the African” The Norton Anthology World Literature. Martin Puchner. New York:
W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 73-98. Book.
Hi Tiffany!
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis this week! I love that you go really into detail with your thoughts. It really lets us readers know what is going on and what you are thinking. I love that last sentence you used. It gives us a direct answer as to what you think the reading was about, you also gave great quotes to back up your reasoning! Great job
Hey Tiffany! Your analysis was awesome to read! You analyzed the reading really well. It gave me a different insight and perspective! I like how you brought up how the European ancestors and the African ancestors, even though they are very different, both sets of ancestors came from uncivilized, uneducated backgrounds. It reminds me kind of how the world seems today...a little uncivilized, so many crazy things going on in the world, there seems like there's so much hate, when in reality, we should be getting along peacefully and helping educate each other on different cultures and societies and the different ways cultures live.
ReplyDeleteHey Tiffany,
ReplyDeleteI truly enjoy your post it gives me further insight into a story that I agree is exposing the control factor of race. Showing that it is nothing having to do with actual skin color but a categorizing tactic white people built our country's foundation on. Meaning that with race they could say who is worthy or unworthy who are savages and who are the ones that are civilized. Great analysis.